<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VoxBlog &#187; Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voxblog.voxland.net/category/mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voxblog.voxland.net</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Android may actually have a chance of beating Windows</title>
		<link>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2009/06/android-may-actually-have-a-chance-of-beating-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2009/06/android-may-actually-have-a-chance-of-beating-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Voxland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxblog.voxland.net/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted, it is several years out, but I think android is the leading contender to supplant windows&#8211;even over Ubuntu and OS X.
One of the largest drivers keeping windows entrenched is that it is what people are used to.  Many argue the superiority of OS X and Ubuntu and have for years, but for the majority [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, it is several years out, but I think android is the leading contender to supplant windows&#8211;even over Ubuntu and OS X.</p>
<p>One of the largest drivers keeping windows entrenched is that it is what people are used to.  Many argue the superiority of OS X and Ubuntu and have for years, but for the majority of users, they are both are not-quite-right-clones of windows.  Buttons are in the wrong spot, Office doesn&#8217;t work the same, some websites don&#8217;t render right.  It doesn&#8217;t matter what the merits of the other operating systems are, they loose because they are different.  That is the reason Windows-based netbooks are outselling Linux netbooks.</p>
<p>Ironically, however, that is the very reason that causes Android to pass windows.   As phones become less of a phone and more of a computer on your pocket, the dominant phone OS will become the OS that users are used to.  At that point, it will be Windows that will become not-quite-right-clone.  At that point, the average user will choose an OS that makes their laptop work like their phone every time.</p>
<p>Why Android, and not iPhone OS?  At WWDC,  Apple talked about how OS X sales haved spiked since release of iPhone&#8211;which may corrabolate my hypothesis.  However, I think that in the long run, the Apple controlled iPhone will not be able to compete with the more open, multi-vendor Android just like they could not compete with the more open Windows/PC.  the iPhone will have a good couple years, but in the end they will be a niche player.</p>
<p>Why Android, and not Windows Mobile.  Although Windows Mobile makes the same arguement I am making, but in reverse (look: your phone works like your laptop!), scaling applications and interfaces down is much more different and difficult than scaling them up.  Mictosoft has had a long time to create a popular mobile OS, but they have yet to deliver because they are too connected to desktop paradigms to create a compelling mobile platform.</p>
<p>Not even Office will be able to keep users on Windows, like it does now.  With users expecting to access their documents remotely and from a large variety of devices, office applcations are going to be forced to a cloud based/multi-device platform.  It may be MS, Google, or someone else who delivers this, but whoever it is will need to have a great Android option available, which will stop Office from being the the Windows-lock-in product that it is today.</p>
<p>Will Android pass Windows as the dominant OS platform?  It is hard to say, and if it does, it will be a long, long time.  Netbook manufacturers are just experimenting with it, and even phone manufacturers are still experimenting with it.  If <em>anyone </em>is able to pass Windows, however, I think that Android has the best chance of the choices available today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2009/06/android-may-actually-have-a-chance-of-beating-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Love My iPod Touch</title>
		<link>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2008/11/i-love-my-ipod-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2008/11/i-love-my-ipod-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Voxland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxblog.voxland.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have I mentioned how that I love my iPod Touch?  Probably not, this is a new blog&#8230;
I see the iPod Touch as not a music player, but an instant-on computer that you can carry with you all the time.  What is not to love about that?  What makes it a computer and not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have I mentioned how that I love my iPod Touch?  Probably not, this is a new blog&#8230;</p>
<p>I see the iPod Touch as not a music player, but an instant-on computer that you can carry with you all the time.  What is not to love about that?  What makes it a computer and not a PDA is having a <em>real</em> web browser.  I have carried a PDA with me since the Palm III and have always loved having pre-downloaded news (remember AvantGo?), ebooks, music, applications, and games with me at all time, but without the Internet it is just a PDA.  My Palm T3 had the ability to connect to the Internet via bluetooth and browse the web, but the browser was so bad it firmly stayed in PDA territory.  With the Safari browser on the iPod Touch, however, you have a real browsing experience and that makes it a real, pocket-size computer&#8211;the first of its kind.</p>
<p>At this point in time, the need for a computer can be broken down into two distinct areas: <em>Internet</em> and <em>Desktop Apps</em>. Both are important, but they have have very different requirements.  Desktop Apps need screen size, keyboard and mouse control, and processing power (think video editing, office, programming).  Internet, on the other hand, needs to be with you all the time.  The Internet is all about information, and the information you want is the most valuable NOW.</p>
<p>While you can certainly fire up Firefox on your deskop/laptop the next time you are near it, what you really need is a Internet platform that you can ALWAYS have with you.  The only device that currently matches that requirement is the iPod Touch/iPhone.  There are times when I look at netbook computers like the Asus eee and the MSI Wind and the gadget geek in me says &#8220;I reaaaaaly need to get one of those&#8221;.  When it comes down to it, however, they are too small for desktop apps yet lack the portability required for the Internet.</p>
<p>Now if only the iPhone was available in my area&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voxblog.voxland.net/2008/11/i-love-my-ipod-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
